tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9131289420618991795.post6437933222108264852..comments2023-06-17T08:53:42.643-04:00Comments on ShysterBall: SpiezioCraig Calcaterrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00190345915954808542noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9131289420618991795.post-83906156446086469702008-02-28T13:35:00.000-05:002008-02-28T13:35:00.000-05:00Got it....thanks for clarifying.Got it....thanks for clarifying.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9131289420618991795.post-62109098370315487082008-02-28T11:07:00.000-05:002008-02-28T11:07:00.000-05:00Brian -- most states have a specific violation for...Brian -- most states have a specific violation for "driving under the influence" without a specific BAC attached to it (i.e. one they can prove if they don't have BAC evidence) in addition to a charge for a BAC-specific violation. Usually you're not charged with both, and my guess is that one of those will go away soon depending on the nature of the evidence they have (when they charge, they charge everything).Craig Calcaterrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00190345915954808542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9131289420618991795.post-25629545565473835062008-02-28T11:01:00.000-05:002008-02-28T11:01:00.000-05:00What's the difference between #1 and #2?Clarify - ...What's the difference between #1 and #2?<BR/><BR/>Clarify - the #1 and #2 in Shyster's post.<BR/><BR/>Isn't #2 just a more specific version of #1?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9131289420618991795.post-57969794376035923522008-02-27T19:24:00.000-05:002008-02-27T19:24:00.000-05:00Well, the Cards have released him so we'll see wha...Well, the Cards have released him so we'll see what that leads to for Spiezio. Some folks on the other boards have pointed out how the team seems to be following LaRussa's "example" when it comes to alcohol-influenced incidents... wonder if there's anything to that?Bradley Ankromhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00376901160507434408noreply@blogger.com